.
Feedback

New Neighborhood Council Election Process in the Works

It will be debated again Saturday at a special meeting and possibly presented to the city council by the end of the month.

What many hope is a new, cost-effective, fair and transparent program for conducting Los Angeles' neighborhood council elections could be submitted to the city council for approval this month.  

A special meeting was held Saturday of the Los Angeles Neighborhood Councils' Election Task Force. It's an advisory group made up of about two dozen representatives from neighborhood councils throughout Los Angeles to examine alternative systems of voting and recommend improvements in the electoral processes of neighborhood councils. 

Since Jan. 26, the group has met four times this year with representatives from the Mayor's office, City Councilman Paul Krekorian and the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE). 

CONCERNS ABOUT 2010 ELECTION

The intent of the task force was to respond to concerns raised following the 2010 citywide neighborhood council elections, which were conducted by the City Clerk. 

The task force has echoed the desire of almost all neighborhood council boards to not have the City Clerk participate in the next round of elections, which should be held in 2012 though a delay to 2014 is also being discussed.

Other objectives of the panel include increasing the number of candidates running for local board and officer positions, increasing the number of voters in every election and identifying the most cost-effective methods for achieving these goals. 

Uniform rules and procedures are difficult to achieve because individual neighborhood councils want the flexibility to determine the dates, places and methods of their elections.

Also, some want to be able to hold elections annually rather than being limited to once every two years.   The new election process would involve using Independent Election Administrators (IEA) to supervise each election. 

These volunteers would be trained and certified by the Department of Neighborhood Empowerment (DONE) to conduct uniform procedures, including candidate verification (meeting the local by-laws requirements), ballot preparation and distribution, and finally, insuring an honest, open count of those ballots. 

DONE WOULD BE FINAL ARBITER OF COMPLAINTS

Any complaints or challenges would be referred to DONE for adjudication by an independent entity.   The task force has previously recommended that neighborhood council elections should include electronic voting, but such a program is estimated to cost up to $800,000. 

DONE's current budget for handling neighborhood council elections is only $120,000.  The cost of the city clerk running the elections was over a million dollars.  

Because of the deadline set by the Los Angeles City Council to consider changing the ordinance that governs these elections, a special meeting of the task force will take place next Saturday, Nov. 12th, at 1 pm, at 114 West 5th Street.

Many expect the final details of the proposal will be approved at this meeting for submission to the city council. 

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Echo Park-Silver Lake Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Mark November 7, 2011 at 08:20 pm
The best thing to do for Neighborhood Council elections is to limit the electorate to only those in the area who are registered to vote in any other election. It was always very misguided to allow non-residents and others otherwise not eligible to vote in any other election to vote in Neighborhood Council elections.
Also, standards a candidate must meet need to be greatly changed. For instance, it is very nice to have some 14 year old kid in middle school and living with mommy and daddy have some worldly experience, but this isn't school, is supposed to be an important panel making critical decisions that just simply require plenty of experience, know how, knowledge, and maturity.
Greg Nelson November 8, 2011 at 01:39 am
It's important to remember that the new City Charter established the primary goal of the NC system the promotion of public participation in government. It's hard increase participation by limiting it.
The process through which we elected our city officials requires that voters be residents. The idea of the NC system was not to try and define who has the greatest interest in a neighborhood, or the city, and limit full participation to them, but rather to provide an opportunity for everyone who wants to participate to do so. In other words, the NC system was purposely designed to add a participatory democracy sytems to our long-standing representative democracy system that needs to be held accountable to the public.
Anthea Raymond (Editor) November 8, 2011 at 02:24 pm
@Greg -- Thanks for your comment. Do you think the issue of stakeholder vs. resident is one that is likely to go away any time soon?
Jennifer Solis November 8, 2011 at 07:30 pm
I agree that the so-called "Factual Basis" stakeholders should vote in the NCs in which they live, work or own property. The original Charter Plan did not allow for outsiders to vote (and sometimes control) NC elections, but the City Council extended this franchise five years later, thanks to the Neighborhood Council Review Commission. As for "youth" board members, I don't believe any NC allows board members under 16 -- and most NCs require at least 18 years of age. The Westlake North NC has three very smart and mature 18-year-olds on its board, for whom I would vote for ANY city elected office.
Jennifer Solis November 8, 2011 at 07:49 pm
The word "neighborhood" implies a definable community of people who are residents, workers or property/business owners within certain bounderies. Why would I want someone who fails to meet ANY of the above criteria to vote in my local governing board election? Although Mr. Nelson is the recognized expert on all things about neighborhood councils, I shall continue to believe that "participatory democracy" starts at home. -- Jennifer Solis
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
nonoise June 16, 2013 at 07:20 am
I recently heard that the scientist found the world had not warmed up in the last 15 years and theyRead More did not know what happened to their predictions.
nonoise June 16, 2013 at 07:22 am
Just wait until the garage sales come back and the trash. Then echo park will need another $150Read More Million.
J, F, June 12, 2013 at 06:42 pm
The fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution states that: the right of the people to beRead More secure in their persons,houses,papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized "this fundamental right has a tense relationship with sobriety checkpoints, at a sobriety checkpoint, drivers are necessary stopped with out reasonable suspicion, and may be tested summarily and with out probable cause, Thus the constitution would prohibit people from being stopped without a search Warrant or at least without probable cause that they have committed a crime; however, the Warrant requirement only attaches should the search be unreasonable and the Supreme Court, as shown below, decided that such stops are not unreasonable under certain circumstances, The United States Supreme Court found properly conducted sobriety checkpoints to be Constitutional, While acknowledging that such checkpoints infringed on a Constitutional Right. Although the U.S. Supreme Court has found sobriety checkpoints to be constitutionally permissible, ten states (Idaho,Iowa,Michigan,Minnesota,Oregon,Rhode Island, Texas,Washington,Wisconsin, and Wyoming) have found that sobriety roadblocks violate their own State Constitutions or have outlawed tHEM.
nonoise June 13, 2013 at 08:44 am
Again, if you see a checkpoint you can still legally turn around or change directions to avoid it asRead More long as you are not already in it. Learn your rights. But don't drink and drive. Call Northeast LAPD to go to take the LAPD Community Based Police Academy course. It's free. Of course, Northeast doesn't let others know about it. You learn your rights a lot of other information they would rather not have you know. Call them and ask how to attend.
chuk bekr June 13, 2013 at 10:10 am
The fact that they are outlawed in some states AND what the constitution says , they areRead More UN-constitutional whether you can avoid them or not, same as checking your citizenship up to 100 miles north of Mexican border (as you simply drive down the road), no probable cause etc.
Cheryl Ortega June 5, 2013 at 10:42 am
The 125th at Logan was great. Parents, students, former teachers, some alumni from the 1940's. ButRead More what is most essential to keep in mind is that Logan, a public school, has educated generations of Echo Park children, natives and immigrants, English-speaking and those learning English, respecting the diverse cultures of families that have made their homes in our community. It's a public school that serves all children, those with children with disabilities, those who have behavior issues, all children. It turns away no one. It does what public schools are supposed to do; it educates the public. And it welcomes parents to participate in decision-making bodies that can influence their child's education.
Lily Hernandez May 31, 2013 at 03:41 pm
Cindy López it's a great house cleaner.
Lily Hernandez May 31, 2013 at 03:42 pm
(323)2004767 it's her number best of luck!!! :-)
Valerie Cooper May 31, 2013 at 05:27 pm
Thank you, Lily!!
anthea raymond May 31, 2013 at 02:49 pm
I am at anthea.raymond@gmail.com.
J, F, June 1, 2013 at 01:32 am
THANKS!!!!!!